Illuminated Coptic sanctuary banner

Matthew 27:1-31 - Judas, Pilate, Barabbas, and the Mocked King

22 min read

Jesus is repeatedly delivered from one set of hands to another, yet the guilt around Him is never successfully transferred. Judas returns the silver. The priests refuse it for the treasury. Pilate sends the choice into the crowd and then washes his hands. The soldiers disguise violence as royal homage. Each person tries, in a different way, to place responsibility somewhere else.

Christ alone does not pass His burden away. He answers the true question, remains silent before corrupt accusation, and receives the robe, crown, reed, and blows without surrendering His kingship. Matthew brings us before an innocent King surrounded by people who know fragments of the truth but refuse the costly return that truth demands. The passage therefore exposes more than obvious cruelty. It exposes remorse without hope, religion without justice, knowledge without courage, and worship without obedience. Yet even here the door of repentance remains open.

Judas Returns the Silver, but Does Not Return to Christ (Matthew 27:1-10)

1 When morning came, all the chief priests and elders of the people plotted against Jesus to put Him to death. 2 And when they had bound Him, they led Him away and delivered Him to Pontius Pilate the governor. 3 Then Judas, His betrayer, seeing that He had been condemned, was remorseful and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, 4 saying, “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.” And they said, “What is that to us? You see to it! ” 5 Then he threw down the pieces of silver in the temple and departed, and went and hanged himself. 6 But the chief priests took the silver pieces and said, “It is not lawful to put them into the treasury, because they are the price of blood.” 7 And they consulted together and bought with them the potter’s field, to bury strangers in. 8 Therefore that field has been called the Field of Blood to this day. 9 Then was fulfilled what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying, “And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the value of Him who was priced, whom they of the children of Israel priced, 10 and gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord directed me.”

Morning brings no reconsideration. The leaders bind Jesus and deliver Him to Pilate so that the judgment already desired can move toward death. The verb “delivered” will return at the end of Pilate’s hearing. Jesus is passed from religious custody into Roman power, while responsibility spreads rather than disappears.

Judas now says what the trial refuses to say: Jesus is innocent. His confession, “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood,” is a true admission. He also returns the silver, an attempt to separate himself from the deed. Matthew calls him “remorseful.” The Greek word can describe regret and can even be used positively elsewhere, so the contrast between remorse and repentance should not be built on the verb alone.1 The story itself gives the terrible distinction. Judas turns back to the priests and the money, but he does not turn toward Christ. He sees the evil of what he has done and concludes that death, rather than mercy, should have the final word.

St John Chrysostom treats the return of the silver as an action that might have borne fruit, then says, “the devil led him out of his repentance too soon, so that he should reap no fruit from thence.”2 Judas must never be used to declare that a ruined person lies beyond Christ’s mercy. His end warns us what despair does: it takes a true recognition of sin and seals it off from confession, prayer, patient healing, and hope. When shame says, “Stay alone until you have punished yourself enough,” the Gospel calls the sinner into the light. Speak to Christ. Speak to a priest. Make restitution where it is possible. Remain where mercy can reach the wound. If despair becomes an immediate danger, do not remain alone; seek urgent help from family, pastoral care, and emergency support.

The priests answer Judas with chilling distance: “What is that to us? You see to it!” They refuse his confession while continuing the act that gives it weight. Then they recognize the coins as “the price of blood” and protect the treasury from them. Their concern is technically religious, but it cannot cleanse the purpose they have chosen. A rule about money becomes a refuge from the weightier demand to stop condemning innocent blood.

Matthew’s wording makes the irony sharper. Judas casts the money into the naos, the sanctuary or temple proper, rather than merely somewhere in the wider temple complex; the wording does not tell us that he entered the Holy Place or exactly where the coins landed.3 The evidence of betrayal is thrown toward the sacred center. The leaders remove it from the treasury and spend it on a burial field, but the name “Field of Blood” keeps the truth in public memory. Chrysostom says that the field became a witness, its name proclaiming the blood guilt “more clearly than a trumpet.”4

Matthew presents the thirty pieces and the potter’s field as fulfillment of the prophetic word. St Cyril of Jerusalem later uses the exact number and the purchased field as a catechetical witness to the Spirit’s foreknowledge of the Passion.5 The passage does not ask us to admire prediction while avoiding repentance. God’s foreknowledge does not excuse betrayal; it reveals that human sin cannot overturn His saving purpose. Even as guilt leaves a field bearing its name, Christ continues freely toward the Cross.

The Silent King Before Pilate (Matthew 27:11-14)

11 Now Jesus stood before the governor. And the governor asked Him, saying, “Are You the King of the Jews?” Jesus said to him, “ It is as you say.” 12 And while He was being accused by the chief priests and elders, He answered nothing. 13 Then Pilate said to Him, “Do You not hear how many things they testify against You?” 14 But He answered him not one word, so that the governor marveled greatly.

“Are You the King of the Jews?” is the question a Roman governor must take seriously. Kingship in this hearing carries political force because unsanctioned rule could be treated as a challenge to imperial authority.6 Jesus answers the actual question: “It is as you say.” He neither denies His kingship nor reshapes it into the kind of armed rivalry Rome knows how to punish. Chrysostom summarizes the confession with precision: “He confessed that He was a king, but a heavenly king.”7

Jesus then answers nothing while accusation gathers around Him. His silence is purposeful because it follows His confession. He has spoken where truth requires speech; He refuses to let hostile testimony dictate His identity or divert Him from the Passion He has accepted. The governor marvels because the Accused will not perform the ordinary struggle for survival before power.

This silence should not be turned into a rule that Christians must never defend themselves or others. Jesus Himself has spoken clearly throughout Matthew, and silence that abandons a vulnerable person can become another form of cowardice. Here the silent Christ is free from compulsive self-justification. He does not need the accusers’ verdict to tell Him who He is, and He will not trade obedience to the Father for one more attempt to control how He is perceived.

That freedom reaches ordinary life. A false accusation can consume the heart long after the conversation ends. We replay the exchange, compose new defenses, and let another person’s judgment occupy the place of God. Christ’s silence asks a harder and more peaceful question: Has truth been served, and can the rest now be entrusted to the Father? Sometimes love requires a clear answer. Sometimes faithfulness means refusing the quarrel and continuing the work God has given.

Barabbas Released and Jesus Delivered (Matthew 27:15-26)

15 Now at the feast the governor was accustomed to releasing to the multitude one prisoner whom they wished. 16 And at that time they had a notorious prisoner called Barabbas. 17 Therefore, when they had gathered together, Pilate said to them, “Whom do you want me to release to you? Barabbas, or Jesus who is called Christ?” 18 For he knew that they had handed Him over because of envy. 19 While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent to him, saying, “Have nothing to do with that just Man, for I have suffered many things today in a dream because of Him.” 20 But the chief priests and elders persuaded the multitudes that they should ask for Barabbas and destroy Jesus. 21 The governor answered and said to them, “Which of the two do you want me to release to you?” They said, “Barabbas!” 22 Pilate said to them, “What then shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” They all said to him, “Let Him be crucified!” 23 Then the governor said, “Why, what evil has He done?” But they cried out all the more, saying, “Let Him be crucified!” 24 When Pilate saw that he could not prevail at all, but rather that a tumult was rising, he took water and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this just Person. You see to it. ” 25 And all the people answered and said, “His blood be on us and on our children.” 26 Then he released Barabbas to them; and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered Him to be crucified.

Pilate is given warning after warning. Matthew tells us that he knows envy is driving the accusation. His wife names Jesus “that just Man.” Pilate himself asks, “Why, what evil has He done?” His problem is not lack of information. It is unwillingness to bear the cost of acting on what he knows.

He tries to turn judgment into a choice for the crowd. Jesus is placed beside Barabbas, a notorious prisoner, and Pilate asks the multitude to decide. The contrast is larger than Pilate intends: the guilty man is released while the innocent Christ is delivered. Matthew does not pause here to state a complete doctrine of atonement, but the scene makes the grace of the Gospel visible. Barabbas walks away because Jesus remains in his place. The Christian sees himself there, not as the better person who would have chosen correctly, but as the guilty one whose freedom has been purchased by the Innocent One.

The crowd’s volume rises while Pilate’s courage contracts. A Passover crowd in Jerusalem could make the threat of tumult politically serious, but that context explains the pressure without excusing the governor.8 Pilate held Roman judicial and military authority. Matthew records hesitation, but he also records the decision: Pilate releases Barabbas, has Jesus scourged, and delivers Him to be crucified. The Greek sentence keeps those actions under Pilate’s agency.9 Water on his hands cannot reverse what his hands authorize.

Chrysostom hears the contradiction and addresses Pilate directly: “Why then didst thou deliver Him up? Why didst thou not rescue Him?”10 Private disagreement with evil is not yet faithfulness. A leader can dislike an unjust outcome, say the correct words in the room, and still secure that outcome by yielding when resistance becomes costly. Repentance begins by naming the action without the cleansing fiction of “I had no choice.” It then seeks courage to tell the truth, protect the person being sacrificed, repair the harm, and accept the loss that justice may require.

The blood cry must not become a weapon

Matthew 27:25 has been used to justify contempt and violence against Jewish people. Such use is a sin against the Gospel. “All the people” names the crowd answering Pilate in this scene; it does not mean every Jewish person then or now, and it does not establish inherited ethnic guilt. Jesus, His Mother, the apostles, the first believers, and Matthew’s own scriptural world are Jewish. The narrative also keeps Roman responsibility visible: Pilate judges, Roman soldiers scourge, and the governor delivers Jesus to crucifixion.

The verse must retain its warning. A persuaded crowd accepts responsibility for demanding innocent blood, and religious leaders have used their influence toward destruction. The Church hears that warning before Christ as a mirror of her own capacity for envy, manipulation, cowardice, and collective frenzy. We do not stand outside the guilty world to identify someone else to blame. Every sinner needs the mercy of the Crucified One.

Chrysostom supplies an essential guardrail from within his commentary. He says that the Lover of mankind did not confirm the sentence upon the children, “nor even on them,” but received those who repented, including Paul and the thousands who believed in Jerusalem.11 The apostolic Church itself is proof that the way of repentance remained open. Christ’s Blood cannot be made a slogan of hatred. It is the saving Blood before which hatred itself must be confessed and healed.

Crowned, Struck, and Mocked as King (Matthew 27:27-31)

27 Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the Praetorium and gathered the whole garrison around Him. 28 And they stripped Him and put a scarlet robe on Him. 29 When they had twisted a crown of thorns, they put it on His head, and a reed in His right hand. And they bowed the knee before Him and mocked Him, saying, “Hail, King of the Jews!” 30 Then they spat on Him, and took the reed and struck Him on the head. 31 And when they had mocked Him, they took the robe off Him, put His own clothes on Him, and led Him away to be crucified.

The mockery moves into the governor’s official military world. “Praetorium” names the governor’s residence or headquarters, and the Greek word behind “garrison” can refer to a cohort, company, or detachment. It does not establish an exact soldier count or settle which Jerusalem building Matthew means.12 What the language does establish is an organized imperial setting. The soldiers turn official space into a counterfeit throne room.

Every object and gesture targets kingship. The robe imitates royal clothing. The thorns become a crown. The reed is placed in Christ’s right hand like a scepter. The soldiers bend the knee and greet Him in the vocative: “Hail, King of the Jews!”13 Then homage becomes spitting and blows. Matthew records the humiliation plainly and without graphic embellishment because the theological center is the true identity of the One being mocked.

Their parody speaks the truth they intend to deny. Jesus is King, yet His reign is revealed through voluntary self-giving rather than domination. He receives false worship without ceasing to be worthy of true worship. He holds the reed without grasping for earthly power. He accepts the crown and continues toward the Cross. The soldiers imagine that helplessness disproves kingship; the Gospel reveals a King free enough to spend His power in saving love.

Chrysostom refuses to hide these humiliations. He says they are read and made known openly, and Christ is worshiped because “He vouchsafed to stoop so much for us as actually to suffer these things.”14 The Church does not protect Christ’s glory by looking away from His abasement. She beholds the mocked King and discovers that divine majesty has drawn near to the deepest human shame without being conquered by it.

The soldiers also expose counterfeit worship. Knees bend, the royal title is spoken, and the supposed scepter is placed in Christ’s hand, while the heart remains closed to His rule. The same contradiction can enter church life. We may bow, chant, serve, and call Him Lord while protecting resentment, dishonesty, cruelty, or secret contempt. The answer is not to abandon outward worship, but to let worship become truthful: bend the will with the knee, give Christ the authority the lips confess, and bring the hidden resistance to repentance.

Heard in the Church’s Good Friday Prayer

The checked authority is the English eBook edition of The Katameros of the Holy Pascha: Readings for the Week of Holy Pascha from the Hosanna Sunday to Good Friday (Lent 1734 A.M./2018 A.D.), prepared by a deacon at St Mary’s Coptic Orthodox Church in Ottawa and issued with a preface by His Grace Bishop Boulos of the Diocese of Ottawa, Montreal, and Eastern Canada. In that edition, Matthew 27:1-14 is the Good Friday First Hour Gospel (printed pp. 552-553), Matthew 27:15-26 the Third Hour Gospel (printed pp. 570-571), and Matthew 27:27-45 the Sixth Hour Gospel (printed pp. 592-593). This study ends at verse 31, within that longer Sixth Hour reading. Matthew 27:1-31 is therefore not one exact lectionary unit.

The hours keep the Church from rushing through the Passion. Judas’s silver, the silent King, the release of Barabbas, Pilate’s handwashing, the blood cry, and the soldiers’ false homage are heard in sustained prayer. The congregation does not gather as a jury over ancient offenders. We stand before Christ and allow every attempt at self-exoneration to be uncovered. Good Friday turns information into compunction: the innocent King is before us, and the proper response is truthful repentance, grateful worship, and mercy toward every person for whom He suffers.

Spiritual Fruit 🍇

  1. Carry remorse toward Christ before shame turns it into isolation. Judas speaks a true confession and returns the silver, but he does not remain where mercy can receive him. When sin becomes visible, resist the urge to disappear, rehearse self-condemnation, or decide that you must punish yourself before approaching God. Name the sin plainly in prayer, bring it to confession, repair what can be repaired, and let another faithful person stand with you until hope becomes possible again.

  2. Examine the clean procedure that protects a harmful choice. The priests refuse blood money for the treasury while continuing toward innocent blood. Pilate uses a public choice and handwashing while authorizing injustice. Before saying, “I followed the process,” ask what outcome your action actually served. In a home, parish, ministry, or workplace, repentance may require reopening the decision, defending the person who carried its cost, and accepting responsibility without blaming the policy, the group, or the loudest voice.

  3. Act on the truth before the crowd becomes your conscience. Pilate knows envy is at work, hears that Jesus is just, and asks what evil He has done. Knowledge without courage still delivers the innocent. Identify one truth you already know but have delayed because obedience may cost approval, comfort, influence, or peace with the group. Pray for courage, seek wise counsel, and take the next honest action while your conscience is still clear enough to hear.

  4. Receive Barabbas’s freedom as your own need for grace. The notorious prisoner contributes nothing to the exchange; Jesus is condemned and he walks away. Bring that image into confession and the Eucharist. Gratitude for mercy leaves no room for superiority over Judas, the leaders, Pilate, the crowd, or the soldiers. The Christian stands among those who need the Innocent One, then extends to others the mercy he did not earn.

  5. Let your obedience agree with your worship. The soldiers bend the knee and call Jesus King while striking Him. Counterfeit homage remains possible whenever public devotion coexists with a private refusal of His commandments. Name one place where your lips say “Lord” while fear, anger, appetite, or pride still rules. Bring that resistance to Christ, ask for a clean heart, and choose one concrete act of obedience that makes the bowed knee truthful.

The passage’s consolation is as strong as its accusation. Every attempt to pass guilt away fails, but Christ does not turn away from the guilty. The King who bears the Passion exposes our excuses so that we can leave them. He receives the sinner who returns, gives courage to the wavering, and turns false homage into the possibility of true worship.

Footnotes

  1. Matthew 27:3 interlinear and lexical entry for metamelomai: https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/27-3.htm and https://biblehub.com/greek/3338.htm ↩

  2. St John Chrysostom, Homily LXXXV on Matthew, on Judas’s remorse, returned silver, and despair: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.iii.LXXXI.html#iii.LXXXI-p36 ↩

  3. Matthew 27:5 interlinear and lexical entry for naos: https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/27-5.htm and https://biblehub.com/greek/3485.htm ↩

  4. St John Chrysostom, Homily LXXXV on Matthew, on the field as a witness: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.iii.LXXXI.html#iii.LXXXI-p52 ↩

  5. St Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lecture XIII, sections 10-11, a thematic catechetical witness concerning the thirty pieces and the potter’s field: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf207.ii.xvii.html#ii.xvii-p70 ↩

  6. Bible Odyssey, “Pontius Pilate,” on Pilate’s Roman governorship and authority: https://www.bibleodyssey.org/people/main-articles/pontius-pilate/ ↩

  7. St John Chrysostom, Homily LXXXVI on Matthew, on Christ as a heavenly King: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.iii.LXXXII.html#iii.LXXXII-p12 ↩

  8. Josephus describes large festival crowds and concern over unrest in other Passover settings; this is analogical context, not an independent report of Jesus’s trial: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/war-2.html#S1.3. Matthew 27:24 uses the term translated “tumult”: https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/27-24.htm ↩

  9. Matthew 27:26 interlinear and lexical entry for Roman scourging: https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/27-26.htm and https://biblehub.com/greek/5417.htm ↩

  10. St John Chrysostom, Homily LXXXVI on Matthew, on Pilate’s handwashing and failure to rescue Jesus: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.iii.LXXXII.html#iii.LXXXII-p28 ↩

  11. St John Chrysostom, Homily LXXXVI on Matthew, on the sentence not being confirmed on the children and on repentant people being received: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.iii.LXXXII.html#iii.LXXXII-p32 ↩

  12. Matthew 27:27 interlinear and lexical entry for speira: https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/27-27.htm and https://biblehub.com/greek/4686.htm ↩

  13. Matthew 27:29 interlinear: https://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/27-29.htm ↩

  14. St John Chrysostom, Homily LXXXVII on Matthew, on the mockery and the Church’s worship of the One who stooped to suffer: https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.iii.LXXXIII.html#iii.LXXXIII-p6 ↩

Reading statusLoading your browser-local progress
Saved only in this browser

Created: | Updated:

Page Connections

Backlinks