Illuminated Coptic sanctuary banner

Leviticus 15 - Bodily Discharges and Cleansing

21 min read

Leviticus 15 brings the ordinary vulnerability of the body into the life of Israel’s sanctuary. Beds, seats, clothing, vessels, sexual emissions, menstrual bleeding, and prolonged discharges all come under its instructions. These details can seem far from worship until the chapter names its reason: God’s tabernacle is among His people. The laws regulate ritual approach to that dwelling. They must be read without turning involuntary bodily processes into moral faults, and in the light of Christ, who heals the suffering woman and calls her His daughter.

An issue and ritual uncleanness (Leviticus 15:1-3)

The study follows NKJV chapter and verse references and prints Brenton’s Septuagint. At 15:3 Brenton uses the historical term ‘gonorrhœa’; NKJV describes a running or stopped discharge. The older English wording does not establish identity with a particular modern diagnosis.

1 And the Lord spoke to Moses and Aaron, saying,

2 Speak to the children of Israel, and thou shalt say to them, Whatever man shall have an issue out of his body, his issue is unclean.

3 And this is the law of his uncleanness; whoever has a gonorrhœa out of his body, this is his uncleanness in him by reason of the issue, by which his body is affected through the issue: all the days of the issue of his body, by which his body is affected through the issue, there is his uncleanness.

God’s instruction concerns a man with an issue from his body. The repeated wording of verse 3 connects his uncleanness with the issue and its duration. This is a ritual status described under Israel’s law, not an account of how the person acquired the condition or a verdict that he committed a sexual sin. The text does not give grounds for imagining either cause.

Careful distinction matters because intimate bodily difficulties often already carry shame. Naming a condition honestly can make help possible; attaching an unsupported accusation can make help harder to seek. The chapter speaks frankly about the body. Our speech should be equally truthful and free from contempt.

Bed, seat, and touch (Leviticus 15:4-7)

4 Every bed on which he that has the issue shall happen to lie, is unclean; and every seat on which he that has the issue may happen to sit, shall be unclean.

5 And the man who shall touch his bed, shall wash his garments, and bathe himself in water, and shall be unclean till evening.

6 And whosoever sits on the seat on which he that has the issue may have sat, shall wash his garments, and bathe himself in water, and shall be unclean until evening.

7 And he that touches the skin of him that has the issue, shall wash his garments and bathe himself in water, and shall be unclean till evening.

The man’s bed and seat become unclean, and those who touch them or his skin must wash their garments, bathe, and remain unclean until evening. The consequences reach people whose only action may be necessary contact. The law does not say that touching proves a morally corrupt intention.

The time limit and washing instructions give a definite way through the condition. Ritual consequences are real, but they are not a permanent identity. A reader should also notice how dependent bodily life is: illness affects the places where one rests and the people who help. Christian compassion must honor that dependence, preserving appropriate care and privacy rather than treating a sufferer’s need as an offense.

Contact and the different treatment of vessels (Leviticus 15:8-12)

8 And if he that has the issue should spit upon one that is clean, that person shall wash his garments, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until evening.

9 And every ass’s saddle, on which the man with the issue shall have mounted, shall be unclean till evening.

10 And every one that touches whatsoever shall have been under him shall be unclean until evening; and he that takes them up shall wash his garments, and bathe himself in water, and shall be unclean until evening.

11 And whomsoever he that has the issue shall touch, if he have not rinsed his hands in water, he shall wash his garments, and bathe his body in water, and shall be unclean until evening.

12 And the earthen vessel which he that has the issue shall happen to touch, shall be broken; and a wooden vessel shall be washed with water, and shall be clean.

Spitting, a saddle, objects beneath the person, and touch with unrinsed hands extend the contact rules. The earthen vessel is broken; a wooden vessel is washed. The law does not require every touched object to be destroyed. Different materials receive different instructions, and the repeated evening limit continues for the persons affected.

This is neither a modern germ theory nor an arbitrary assertion that bodies are evil. It is an ordered ritual account of contact near the sanctuary. We can see its seriousness without claiming medical explanations the passage does not supply. Its practical distinctions also keep reverence from becoming indiscriminate fear: washing is sufficient where washing is prescribed.

Cleansing and the eighth-day offering (Leviticus 15:13-15)

At 15:13 NKJV specifies running water for bathing; adopted Brenton says to bathe the body ‘in water’. Brenton’s complete sentence is retained without adding the other edition’s adjective.

13 And if he that has the issue should be cleansed of his issue, then shall he number to himself seven days for his purification; and he shall wash his garments, and bathe his body in water, and shall be clean.

14 And on the eighth day he shall take to himself two turtle-doves or two young pigeons, and he shall bring them before the Lord to the doors of the tabernacle of witness, and shall give them to the priest.

15 And the priest shall offer them one for a sin-offering, and the other for a whole-burnt-offering; and the priest shall make atonement for him before the Lord for his issue.

When the issue has ceased, seven days are counted for purification. The man washes his garments and bathes, and on the eighth day brings two doves or young pigeons to the priest at the tabernacle’s doors. One becomes a sin-offering, the other a whole-burnt-offering, and atonement is made before the Lord. The movement is from an enduring condition to a completed approach.

The use of a sin-offering does not supply a missing story of personal wrongdoing. The offering belongs to the law’s purification sequence. Hebrews 9:13-14 distinguishes the sanctification of the flesh under the old rites from Christ’s cleansing of the conscience for service to the living God. The comparison honors the old rites’ stated role while locating our deeper hope in Christ’s own offering.

Natural emission and moral responsibility (Leviticus 15:16-18)

16 And the man whose seed of copulation shall happen to go forth from him, shall then wash his whole body, and shall be unclean until evening.

17 And every garment, and every skin on which there shall be the seed of copulation shall both be washed with water, and be unclean until evening.

18 And a woman, if a man shall lie with her with seed of copulation—they shall both bathe themselves in water and shall be unclean until evening.

The emission of semen requires bathing and uncleanness until evening. Garments and leather on which it falls are washed, and after intercourse both man and woman bathe and share the evening limit. The text names bodily processes without accusing the pair in verse 18 of adultery. A ritual consequence is not the same thing as a declaration that marriage or involuntary emission is morally evil.

1 Corinthians 6:18-20 gives the Christian body its high calling as belonging to God and as a temple of the Holy Spirit. That calling demands freedom from chosen sexual sin, not disgust with created bodily life. The distinction between involuntary function and freely chosen conduct is essential if reverence is to remain truthful.

Gems from the Fathers 💎: Nature’s necessities and the heart’s sins

St. Athanasius’s Letter 48 to Amun addresses ascetics troubled by scruples about involuntary secretions. It is a pastoral letter, not a running commentary on Leviticus or a promulgation of menstrual regulations. He begins with creation’s goodness: ‘All things made by God are beautiful and pure, for the Word of God has made nothing useless or impure.’1 He then names ordinary emissions from nose, mouth, bowels, and seminal channels, and distinguishes nature’s necessities from moral choices.

He rejects an abuse of Christ’s saying about what goes out of a person: in Matthew 15 the Lord names evil arising from the heart, not necessary bodily excretion. Athanasius also distinguishes lawful married use from adultery and licentiousness, honors marriage, commends freely chosen virginity, and ends by urging Amun to strengthen his flock through Scripture and purity of heart. His reassurance therefore belongs with repentance, not with moral indifference.

These laws describe bodily conditions and their ritual consequences; involuntary bodily processes are not moral defilement. St. Athanasius, writing to Amun about bodily secretions, makes the distinction plainly: ‘For then only do we incur defilement, when we commit sin, that foulest of things. But when any bodily excretion takes place independently of will, then we experience this, like other things, by a necessity of nature.’2 A woman suffering an issue of blood remains worthy of compassion and capable of faith; Christ calls the healed woman His daughter and sends her in peace. The ancient purification laws and Athanasius’s pastoral letter do not by themselves settle present Communion practice. The question of preparation for Communion in these bodily circumstances belongs with the Church’s priest, and is reserved here for Fr. Boulos’s guidance.

The woman’s separation (Leviticus 15:19-21)

Brenton 15:19 says ‘issue of blood’; NKJV says ‘discharge’. The study keeps Brenton’s language. This is not an exact English match to NKJV Mark 5:25, which says ‘flow of blood’.

19 And the woman whosoever shall have an issue of blood, when her issue shall be in her body, shall be seven days in her separation; every one that touches her shall be unclean until evening.

20 And every thing whereon she shall lie in her separation, shall be unclean; and whatever she shall sit upon, shall be unclean.

21 And whosoever shall touch her bed shall wash his garments, and bathe his body in water, and shall be unclean until evening.

The woman with the described issue of blood has seven days of separation. Touch and the bed or seat on which she rests carry ritual consequences; one touching her bed washes garments, bathes, and is unclean until evening. These are instructions about the condition and its contacts. They do not identify menstruation as a moral failure or make the woman’s body contemptible.

The word ‘separation’ names a real restriction in this ancient setting. A truthful reading need not conceal its burden. It must also refuse the added burden of blaming a woman for an involuntary process. Where such experiences are discussed, modesty and privacy can coexist with clear explanation and compassion.

The consequences of contact (Leviticus 15:22-24)

22 And every one that touches any vessel on which she shall sit, shall wash his garments and bathe himself in water, and shall be unclean until evening.

23 And whether it be while she is on her bed, or on a seat which she may happen to sit upon when he touches her, he shall be unclean till evening.

24 And if any one shall lie with her, and her uncleanness be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and every bed on which he shall have lain shall be unclean.

The rules continue for objects on which she sits, for contact associated with her bed or seat, and for a man lying with her so that her uncleanness is upon him. The last case carries seven days, not merely an evening, and affects his bed. The durations are differentiated rather than interchangeable.

These verses keep the law’s ancient contact categories before us; they do not furnish an account of the woman’s character. Their literal subject should remain clear before any application is made. Christian teaching about the heart’s defilement in Matthew 15:10-20 concerns evils arising from the heart, including murder, adultery, and false witness. An involuntary bodily process is not one of those freely chosen evils.

Prolonged bleeding and the daughter Christ heals (Leviticus 15:25-27)

Brenton 15:25 prints ‘issue of blood’ and 15:26 ‘flux’; NKJV uses discharge language here. NKJV Mark 5:25 says ‘flow of blood’. The connection concerns the woman’s bodily suffering and the law’s ritual background, not identical English phrases.

25 And if a woman have an issue of blood many days, not in the time of her separation; if the blood should also flow after her separation, all the days of the issue of her uncleanness shall be as the days of her separation: she shall be unclean.

26 And every bed on which she shall lie all the days of her flux shall be to her as the bed of her separation, and every seat whereon she shall sit shall be unclean according to the uncleanness of her separation.

27 Every one that touches it shall be unclean; and he shall wash his garments, and bathe his body in water, and shall be unclean till evening.

The issue continues beyond the ordinary time of separation or occurs outside it. The repeated reference to ‘all the days’ names the burden of a condition with no quick endpoint. Beds, seats, and contact remain affected throughout. What could be temporary has become prolonged.

Mark 5:25-34 and Luke 8:43-48 bring this burden before Christ in the woman who has suffered twelve years. She touches His garment and receives healing. He brings her into speech with Him, calls her daughter, and sends her in peace. The Gospel’s central gift is not only the cessation of bleeding: the frightened sufferer hears the Lord address her personally. Wisdom 16:12, speaking of Israel’s healing, gives a fitting theological companion: ‘thy word, O Lord, which healeth all things’. This does not reject medical care; it places the deepest source of healing in God.

Gems from the Fathers 💎: Her faith had made her a daughter

St. John Chrysostom explains the woman’s fear in Matthew 9 through Leviticus 15:25. He understands why she approached secretly and why Christ brought her forward. The Lord removes the fear that she had somehow stolen a gift, reveals her faith, and gives assurance. Chrysostom writes: ‘On account then of all these things He brings her forward, and says, Daughter, be of good cheer, even as He had said also to the paralyzed person, Son, be of good cheer. Because in truth the woman was exceedingly alarmed; therefore He says, be of good cheer, and He calls her daughter; for her faith had made her a daughter. After that comes also her praise: Your faith has made you whole.’3

The disclosure serves her healing rather than the crowd’s curiosity. She need not carry away a cured body and a frightened conscience. The Lord’s address gives her a place before Him, and her faith becomes encouragement to others. This Gospel scene does not authorize forced disclosure of anyone’s private illness.

The Church’s Voice in Worship ⛪

The Church reads Mark 5:21–43 at Vespers on Monday of the fifth week of the Holy Fifty Days, including Christ’s healing of the woman with the flow of blood.4 The Resurrection season places her healing beside the raising of Jairus’s daughter: the Lord gives life where prolonged suffering and death appear to have closed the way. This is a related Gospel appointment, not a reading of Leviticus 15 itself.

The Litany of the Gospel in the Unction’s First Prayer petitions, ‘Those who have already fallen asleep, repose them. Those who are sick, heal them.’5 The Church hears the healing Gospel while praying for those whose bodies remain vulnerable. Prayer is directed to the life-giving Lord; neither the ancient law nor this petition supplies a present Communion ruling.

A way back after the flux (Leviticus 15:28-30)

Brenton uses ‘flux’ in 15:28 and ‘unclean flux’ in 15:30, while NKJV uses discharge language. These are historical English ways of naming the described bodily flow, not an additional moral accusation.

28 But if she shall be cleansed from her flux, then she shall number to herself seven days, and afterwards she shall be esteemed clean.

29 And on the eighth day she shall take two turtle-doves, or two young pigeons, and shall bring them to the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of witness.

30 And the priest shall offer one for a sin-offering, and the other for a whole-burnt-offering, and the priest shall make atonement for her before the Lord for her unclean flux.

When the flux ceases, the woman counts seven days and afterward is esteemed clean. On the eighth day she brings the same two kinds of birds available to the man earlier in the chapter, and the priest offers a sin-offering and a whole-burnt-offering for her. The way back is explicitly provided; prolonged uncleanness is not made a permanent identity.

The correspondence between the male and female purification sequences prevents a reading that treats women alone as a bodily problem. Both stand under the ancient laws, and both are given a path of restoration before the Lord. A Christian reading receives that concern in the light of Christ’s saving work, without inventing a present sacramental discipline from the interval or the offerings.

The tabernacle among them (Leviticus 15:31-33)

Brenton 15:31 says Israel must ‘beware of their uncleannesses’; NKJV speaks of separating them from uncleanness. Both connect the danger to defiling God’s dwelling. The complete Brenton wording remains the reading.

31 And ye shall cause the children of Israel to beware of their uncleannesses; so they shall not die for their uncleanness, in polluting my tabernacle that is among them.

32 This is the law of the man who has an issue, and if one discharge seed of copulation, so that he should be polluted by it.

33 And this is the law for her that has the issue of blood in her separation, and as to the person who has an issue of seed, in his issue: it is a law for the male and the female, and for the man who shall have lain with her that is set apart.

The chapter finally states its purpose: Israel must beware of uncleanness so that the tabernacle among them is not polluted. The warning of death is grave, and its setting is specific. God has placed His dwelling among His people, and approach to it is governed by His command. The closing verses gather the male and female cases together rather than letting the long discussion become a verdict against one sex.

Hebrews 10:22 directs Christians to draw near with a true heart, the heart sprinkled from an evil conscience and the body washed with pure water. Nearness to God is received with reverence and hope. In Christ, the conscience must be cleansed of chosen evil; the created body need not be hated. We approach as persons whom the incarnate Lord has come to save, and bodily vulnerability remains a reason for care rather than contempt.

Spiritual Fruit 🍇

Refuse false guilt for what happens involuntarily in the body. If bodily scruples have begun to crowd out prayer, receive Athanasius’s distinction between nature’s necessities and chosen sin. Bring actual sins to confession honestly, and bring questions of sacramental preparation to the Church’s priest without trying to settle them by anxious private inference.

Protect the dignity of people whose suffering is intimate or prolonged. Keep confidence, avoid jokes and speculation, and offer practical help without demanding details. The woman in the Gospel needed healing and peace, not another reason to hide.

Reverence should purify the heart as well as order outward approach. Examine anger, deceit, sexual wrongdoing, and contempt that you freely entertain. Christ’s account of defilement gives repentance a true object; fear of natural functions can distract us from that work.

Lord Jesus Christ, You knew the woman who touched Your garment and You called her daughter. Receive those whose suffering has lasted many days and those whose shame makes speech difficult. Keep our hearts truthful before You and gentle toward one another. Let Your word of peace teach us to approach with hope, without inventing judgments You have not given.

Footnotes

  1. St. Athanasius of Alexandria, Letter 48 to Amun, opening paragraph (unsectioned), before 354 per edition; Archibald Robertson translation, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series 4 (1892). Containing text. ↩

  2. St. Athanasius of Alexandria, Letter 48 to Amun, opening paragraph, natural secretion argument; Archibald Robertson translation, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series 4 (1892). Containing text. ↩

  3. St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on Matthew, Homily 31 §2, on Matthew 9:20–22; George Prevost translation, revised M. B. Riddle, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, first series 10 (1888). Containing text. ↩

  4. Coptic Reader, Readings / Vespers, Monday of the fifth week of the Holy Fifty Days, Mark 5:21–43; appointment indexed in @andraws/lectionary-data 1.3.1. Coptic Reader. ↩

  5. Coptic Reader, Special / Unction / First Prayer, Litany of the Gospel, petition for the departed and sick. Rite text. The cited containing service is Unction, not a newly asserted ordinary Vespers menu. ↩

Reading statusLoading your browser-local progress
Saved only in this browser

Created: | Updated:

Page Connections

Backlinks