The Feast of Dedication remembered worship restored in a desecrated temple. In that setting, Jesus walks in the temple and speaks of works done in His Father’s name, sheep held in His Father’s hand, and a unity with the Father that His opponents recognize as a divine claim.1 The question beneath the confrontation is therefore larger than whether Jesus will accept the title of Christ. Can the works of God stand before us and still be refused because receiving their witness would require obedience?
In this new Dedication setting, “My sheep hear My voice” resumes the Shepherd discourse of John 10:1-21, while the opened eyes of John 10:21 lead into the works that bear witness in John 10:25.
John’s conflict language requires care. “The Jews” in this scene means the particular temple opponents who surround Jesus, take up stones, and try to seize Him, not the Jewish people as an ethnicity. Jesus and His first disciples are themselves Jewish. The passage exposes a resistance to Christ that can harden any human heart, including one that knows religious words yet remains unwilling to follow where the truth leads.
The passage begins with a demand for plainer proof and ends with people believing because an old witness has proved true. Between those scenes, Jesus reveals the security of His sheep, the divine weight of His works, and the mystery at the center of Christian worship: the Father is in the Son, the Son is in the Father, and the hand that keeps the flock is one divine power.
The Feast, the Works, and the Sheep No One Can Snatch (John 10:22-30)
22 Now it was the Feast of Dedication in Jerusalem, and it was winter. 23 And Jesus walked in the temple, in Solomon’s porch. 24 Then the Jews surrounded Him and said to Him, “How long do You keep us in doubt? If You are the Christ, tell us plainly.”
25 Jesus answered them, “I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in My Father’s name, they bear witness of Me. 26 But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep, as I said to you. 27 My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. 28 And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand. 29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father’s hand. 30 I and My Father are one.”
Solomon’s porch was a temple colonnade whose name carried an ancient association with Solomon.2 John gives the place and season without turning them into drama. What matters is that the confrontation occurs publicly in the temple during a feast of renewed worship. The opponents ask Jesus to end their suspense: “If You are the Christ, tell us plainly.” His answer is severe because their request ignores testimony already given. “I told you,” He says, and then points to the works that bear witness in His Father’s name.
The demand for more proof can sound like openness while functioning as delay. A person can keep moving the line at which obedience will begin: one more explanation, one more sign, one more certainty that costs nothing. Jesus does not despise sincere questions; throughout this Gospel He receives people whose understanding is partial. Here, however, the works have already spoken and the threatened stoning reveals what the demand was becoming. Evidence cannot force a heart to love the light.
“You are not of My sheep” describes their present refusal through the marks Jesus immediately names. His sheep hear His voice, are known by Him, and follow Him. The verse does not offer a fatalistic label that makes repentance pointless. The Shepherd’s warning itself calls the resistant hearer to become what he is refusing to be. Hearing in this passage is more than receiving sound or mastering doctrine. It ripens into following.
The order of verse 27 is a mercy. Christ does not say that His sheep first make themselves worthy of being known. “I know them” stands at the center. Their life with Him is personal before it is impressive: they hear the voice of the One who knows them, and they follow. For the believer whose prayer feels weak or whose faith is pressed by fear, assurance begins in Christ’s knowledge and gift, not in the intensity of one’s feelings.
Then the promise widens: “I give them eternal life.” Eternal life is not merely survival after death. In John, it is the life of communion received from the Son, the Life who comes from the Father and gives Himself to His people. The Greek wording behind “they shall never perish” is emphatic, a strong denial that the sheep will perish forever.3 Yet the promise remains joined to the Shepherd-sheep relation of the preceding verse. Christ’s keeping does not make hearing, following, repentance, or life in His flock unnecessary. It makes them possible without despair.
The repeated verb “snatch” names an assault from outside. No hostile power can tear the sheep from Christ’s hand. Then Jesus speaks of the Father’s hand. He does not place His protection beside the Father’s as a second, weaker shelter. The Son gives eternal life; the Son holds the sheep; the Father holds the sheep; no one can overcome either hand. The paragraph leads directly to “I and My Father are one.” The doctrine is already active before it is stated: one divine keeping power is guarding the flock.
The Greek of verse 30 preserves both unity and distinction. “One” is neuter singular, while “are” is plural.4 Jesus does not say that He is the Father. Father and Son remain distinct Persons. Nor does “one” mean only that two servants share a purpose. In this context, the Son gives eternal life and exercises the same unconquerable keeping power as the Father. The Church’s Nicene confession protects both truths: the Father is Father, the Son is Son, and the Son is consubstantial with the Father.
This is doctrine with immediate spiritual weight. If Christ were a lesser guardian, the promise “no one shall snatch them out of My hand” could not carry the soul’s fear, guilt, suffering, and death. Because the Shepherd is truly one with the Father, the believer can entrust to Him what cannot be controlled: a child’s future, a family under strain, a hidden temptation, an illness, the hour of death. Faith still hears and follows, but it follows from inside a hand no creature can overpower.
Gems from the Fathers 💎 - One Power, One Divine Keeping
St John Chrysostom hears a summons, rather than fatalism, in Christ’s words about the sheep. He says the warning was spoken so “that they might strive to become sheep.”5 The verse exposes unbelief while leaving the hearer responsible to turn, listen, and follow. Christ’s diagnosis is sharp because His desire is life.
Chrysostom then follows the exact sequence from the Son’s hand to the Father’s hand and finally to verse 30. “Hand” signifies power and authority, not bodily form. Since no one can snatch the sheep from either hand, Chrysostom concludes, “if the power be the same, it is clear that the Essence is also.”6 His doctrinal point serves the promise: the Son who keeps the flock possesses no borrowed or fragile power.
St Athanasius rejects the claim that “one” means only agreement of will. Angels and saints can obey God’s will, but the Only-Begotten alone speaks of being one with the Father and of dwelling in the Father as the Father dwells in Him. Athanasius reads these sayings through the Son’s unique identity as the Father’s true and natural Image.7 The unity is living communion without confusion of Persons.
For our life
Some hearts demand endless clarity because the next faithful step is costly. The remedy is not intellectual carelessness. It is honesty before Christ: name the work of God you already recognize, confess where delay has become resistance, and take the next act of obedience His word has made clear.
Other hearts hear the promise of Christ’s hand and still live as if everything depends on their grip. Bring that fear into prayer. Ask for the grace to hear and follow today while entrusting what you cannot secure to the Father and the Son. The Shepherd does not shame the trembling sheep. He gives eternal life and keeps what belongs to Him.
Stones, Scripture, and the Son Sanctified and Sent (John 10:31-38)
31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him. 32 Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?”
33 The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.”
34 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I said, “You are gods” ’? 35 If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), 36 do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’? 37 If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; 38 but if I do, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him.”
The stones show that the opponents understood the force of Jesus’ words. Their accusation is not that He has offered a minor correction to their theology. “You, being a Man, make Yourself God.” These are the actions of the particular temple opponents in this scene, not an indictment of Jewish people. Jesus does not answer by withdrawing verse 30. He asks which good work from the Father deserves stoning, then exposes the inconsistency of their charge through the Scripture they claim to defend.
The question about the works is morally searching. Jesus has shown works that give life, healing, sight, pasture, and protection. Violence now answers goodness. A heart can become so committed to preserving its judgment that even mercy is treated as evidence against the merciful One. Correct religious language does not protect us from this hardness. We need the humility to let the works of Christ judge our judgment.
Jesus quotes Psalm 82: “I said, ‘You are gods.’” His argument moves from the lesser to the greater. Scripture can apply the word “gods” to those “to whom the word of God came.” That scriptural usage cannot justify condemning the One uniquely sanctified and sent by the Father, whose works are the Father’s own works. Jesus is not reducing Himself to one honorary god among many. The paragraph rises toward “I am the Son of God” and “the Father is in Me, and I in Him.”
This distinction also guards the Orthodox teaching of participation in divine life. Human beings are drawn into communion with God by grace; they do not become additional gods by essence. Holiness is received communion. The Son is different: He is the eternal Word through whom grace is given. The deified creature receives; the Son possesses divine life by nature and shares it. Psalm 82 therefore does not lower Christ. In the hands of Christ, it exposes why the accusation against Him fails.
“And the Scripture cannot be broken” reveals how closely Jesus reads. The verb rendered “broken” can carry the sense of being loosed, undone, or set aside.8 A single scriptural word cannot simply be nullified because it inconveniences an accusation. Yet Christ’s example also rebukes careless proof-texting. He does not throw a phrase into the argument without context. He follows the wording, identifies those to whom it applies, and reasons from it toward the truth before His hearers. Reverence for Scripture includes patient attention.
The feast remembered dedication; Jesus speaks of the One whom the Father “sanctified and sent into the world.” The terms are not wordplay, but the narrative contrast is striking. While the temple’s dedication is being remembered, the true Son identifies Himself as the One set apart for the Father’s saving mission. “Sanctified” cannot mean that the eternal Son once lacked holiness. Read within the Incarnation, it names His consecration and self-offering in the humanity He assumed for the life of the world.
“Sent” names mission, not inferiority of divine nature. John holds together truths that must remain together: the Son comes from the Father and obeys within the saving economy; the same Son gives life, performs the Father’s works, shares the Father’s glory, and is one with Him. The eternal Word truly entered human life and accepted the path that leads to the Cross. His humility is the action of divine love, not evidence that He is a creature.
Jesus then places the works before His opponents with remarkable openness: “If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me.” He does not ask them to call violence faith or to accept an empty title. The works disclose the identity of the Worker. Even if hostility blocks trust in His words, He urges them to begin with what they can see, so that recognition may deepen into faith.
The goal is “that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him.” This is more than cooperation. The Father is not absent while the Son acts, and the Son is not a distant agent carrying out orders from a higher being. Their mutual indwelling reveals unity of divine life and action while preserving the Father and the Son as distinct Persons. The works of mercy are therefore revelations of God. In Christ, divine power is not bare force. It gives life, restores, keeps, and seeks belief even from those holding stones.
Gems from the Fathers 💎 - Gods by Grace, the Son by Nature
St John Chrysostom reads the Psalm 82 argument from lesser to greater. If people who received an honor by grace could bear the scriptural title without blasphemy, the Son who has divinity by nature cannot rightly be condemned for saying, “I am the Son of God.”9 Chrysostom then notes that Christ returns to the works because they reveal equality with the Father rather than an empty claim to status.
St Cyril of Alexandria sharpens the distinction. Those who receive the word are illumined and raised by grace, but Christ is the Word through whom that gift comes. Cyril asks, “how could He through Whom they became gods, be other than in His Nature God?”10 The question protects deification from two opposite errors: human beings are truly called into communion with God, and the Son remains uniquely God by nature.
Cyril also reads “sanctified and sent” according to the Son’s Incarnation and saving self-humiliation. Mission does not divide the Son from the Father or make Him less in divinity. The One sent into the world remains “Consubstantial with Him and Coequal in glory.”11 Older theological language can feel distant, but the pastoral truth is immediate: the Christ who comes near enough to suffer is still the Lord in whom the fullness of divine life is present.
On mutual indwelling, Cyril says that “the sameness of their Essence makes the Father to be and to be seen in the Son, and the Son in the Father.”12 Distinct Persons are not divided into separate divine powers. The Father’s works are visible in the Son because the Son shares the Father’s divine essence.
St Athanasius holds the same balance against two distortions. The Son is not the Father, for He says, “I am the Son of God.” Yet Father and Son cannot be divided into unequal beings, for Christ says both “I and My Father are one” and “the Father is in Me, and I in Him.”13 Orthodox confession neither confuses the Persons nor weakens the Son.
The Church’s voice in worship ⛪
Checked Coptic lectionary evidence places John 10:22-38 in Feast of the Cross and annual date-cycle Liturgy Gospel rows. John 10:34-38 is also read on Friday of the fourth week of the Holy Fifty Days, and John 10:29-38 appears in Pascha Eve Ninth Hour evidence for Wednesday Eve and Thursday Eve. The checked evidence does not identify John 10:39-42 as part of those assignments, so the whole session should not be presented as one lectionary unit.
The placements illuminate the passage without replacing its exegesis. At the Feast of the Cross and in Pascha, the Church hears the Son confess His unity with the Father while opposition gathers around Him. The One whom the Father sanctified and sent will give Himself upon the Cross, yet the threatened stones and attempted seizure do not control His hour. His self-offering is the saving work of the consubstantial Son.
For our life
It is possible to use correct doctrine as protection from Christ rather than communion with Him. When being right becomes permission to despise, dismiss, or wound, the good works of the Father stand in judgment over our use of truth. Bring that hardness to confession before it learns to call mercy blasphemy.
Read Scripture under the patience of Christ. Slow down when a verse unsettles you. Attend to the words, the surrounding argument, and the Church’s confession. The answer to misuse is neither embarrassment about Scripture nor a louder proof-text. It is deeper obedience to the Lord who says that Scripture cannot be broken and then shows us how to read it truthfully.
Beyond the Jordan and the Witness That Still Bears Fruit (John 10:39-42)
39 Therefore they sought again to seize Him, but He escaped out of their hand.
40 And He went away again beyond the Jordan to the place where John was baptizing at first, and there He stayed. 41 Then many came to Him and said, “John performed no sign, but all the things that John spoke about this Man were true.” 42 And many believed in Him there.
The passage has spoken twice of the hand from which no one can snatch Christ’s sheep. Now the opponents try to seize Jesus with their own hands, and He escapes. The contrast is quiet and exact. Human violence cannot master the Shepherd or overturn His appointed work. He will lay down His life freely when His hour comes; He is not carried to the Cross by forces stronger than Himself.
Jesus goes beyond the Jordan “to the place where John was baptizing at first.” John’s Gospel returns to one of its beginnings. The Baptist had pointed away from himself toward the Lamb of God and the Son of God. Now, after Jesus’ words and works have accumulated, people remember that testimony and find it true. The place becomes a meeting point between witness given earlier and faith born later.
“John performed no sign” is not a dismissal. The sentence honors the particular grace of his ministry. John did not need to compete with the One he announced. His task was to tell the truth about Christ, then decrease. The signs belong to Jesus; the witness belongs to the servant. Because Christ confirms the witness, John’s words continue to work after he has left the scene.
This is consolation for service that seems small. A parent repeats the faith in an ordinary home, a deacon chants faithfully without recognition, a servant prepares a lesson for a distracted class, a friend speaks one honest word about Christ and sees no immediate response. John 10 does not promise visible success on our schedule. It reveals a better hope: Christ can make truthful testimony bear fruit when the witness is no longer present to measure it.
The temple opponents had demanded a plainer statement while resisting the works already before them. Beyond the Jordan, others put word and work together: “all the things that John spoke about this Man were true.” Faith grows where witness yields to Christ and His works are allowed to confirm the word. Many believe there, away from the center of religious power, because they receive what others had turned into grounds for violence.
St Cyril of Alexandria also reads the return beyond the Jordan typologically, seeing in the water a baptismal figure and in the gathering there a sign of the nations coming to Christ.14 This is a patristic spiritual reading, not an archaeological identification of the site or a claim that every geographical detail is an allegory. Its value lies in the Gospel’s own direction: people cross toward the place of baptismal witness, come to Christ, and believe.
Gems from the Fathers 💎 - The Witness Confirmed by Christ
St John Chrysostom says the place beyond the Jordan recalled John and his testimony. The people reason from the difference between witness and sign: John performed no miracle, yet he spoke truly; Christ’s mighty works therefore confirm what John had said.15 John’s lack of signs makes the agreement more striking. He could not have manufactured the works that later vindicated his testimony.
Cyril preserves John’s proper honor. The Baptist does not perform the God-befitting works that reveal Christ’s identity, but he tells the truth concerning the One who does. The servant’s holiness is shown in refusing to take the place of the Lord. The final fruit of witness is not that people admire John. It is that “many believed in Him there.”
For our life
Release the need to control the fruit of faithful service. Prepare carefully, speak truthfully, repent when pride enters, and leave the confirmation to Christ. Hidden faithfulness is not wasted merely because applause, conversion, or visible change does not arrive while you are watching.
Remember also where another person’s witness first helped you recognize Christ. Give thanks for the parent, priest, servant, friend, or quiet believer whose words proved true over time. Then become that kind of witness for someone else: precise about Christ, free from self-display, and patient enough to let the Lord confirm the testimony.
Spiritual Fruit 🍇
1. Stop moving the line at which obedience will begin. The opponents ask for plain speech after Christ’s words and works have already borne witness. Notice where “I need more clarity” has become a respectable name for delay: apologizing to someone you wounded, ending a dishonest habit, returning to confession, forgiving an old offense, or taking prayer seriously. Bring the real resistance to Christ and obey the light already given.
2. Entrust what fear cannot secure to the Shepherd’s hand. Some believers live as though a family, ministry, health crisis, or child’s future will collapse if they loosen their mental grip for one hour. Verses 27-30 do not promise control. They promise Christ. Pray concretely: “Lord, teach me to hear and follow today, and hold what I cannot hold.” His hand is not weaker than the Father’s, and His knowledge of you is deeper than your fear.
3. Let Christ’s divinity change the weight of your worship. “I and My Father are one” is not a doctrinal ornament. The Son who receives your prayer, gives eternal life, and holds the flock shares the Father’s divine power and essence. When you say the Creed or approach the Eucharist, resist absent repetition. Confess with attention that the One who came in humility is the true Son, consubstantial with the Father, able to save and keep.
4. Refuse to use Scripture as a weapon that excuses hardness. Jesus says Scripture cannot be broken, and He also reads it with precision, patience, and truth. If a verse becomes a tool for winning, humiliating, or avoiding your own repentance, stop before speaking. Read the context, seek the Church’s mind, and ask whether your use of the text resembles the good works of the Father. Reverence for Scripture should make the heart more obedient to Christ, not more pleased with its own severity.
5. Serve without demanding visible proof that your faithfulness mattered. John performed no sign, yet his words were true and many later believed. This is grace for the unnoticed parent, servant, deacon, teacher, and friend. Do the work Christ actually gave you: tell the truth, point away from yourself, pray for the person, and remain faithful when fruit is hidden. Christ can confirm a witness after the witness has stepped aside.
Teaching Notes
The Feast, the Works, and the Sheep No One Can Snatch (John 10:22-30)
- Ask: Why does Jesus answer the demand for a title by pointing to His works, His sheep, and His unity with the Father?
- Emphasize: The passage joins assurance to relationship. The sheep hear, are known, follow, receive eternal life, and are held by the Son and the Father.
- Watch for: Keep the opponents specific to the temple scene. Do not generalize blame against Jewish people. Avoid fatalism in verse 26 and presumption in verses 28-29.
- Connect: Ask the group to name one area where the demand for more certainty may be delaying an act of obedience, and one fear that needs to be entrusted to Christ’s hand.
- Show: Trace the repeated “hand” language into verse 30. Use Chrysostom to explain why sameness of keeping power reveals the Son’s equality with the Father.
Stones, Scripture, and the Son Sanctified and Sent (John 10:31-38)
- Ask: How does Psalm 82 answer the accusation without reducing Jesus to one honorary “god” among others?
- Emphasize: Jesus argues from those who receive a title through the word of God to the Son who is God by nature. His works and mutual indwelling with the Father carry the claim forward.
- Watch for: Preserve both sides of Orthodox confession. Father and Son are distinct Persons, and the Son is fully divine. “Sent” names the Incarnation and saving mission, not inferiority of nature.
- Connect: Discuss the difference between careful use of Scripture and proof-texting. Let participants identify how correct words can be used to resist mercy or protect pride.
- Show: Read verses 32, 37, and 38 together. The good works are not an interruption in the doctrinal dispute; they reveal what divine power looks like in Christ.
Beyond the Jordan and the Witness That Still Bears Fruit (John 10:39-42)
- Ask: Why does the Gospel return to the place of John’s first baptizing, and why does it mention that John performed no sign?
- Emphasize: John’s testimony is vindicated by Christ’s works. The witness does not create the sign or control the fruit; he tells the truth about Christ.
- Watch for: Do not diminish John or romanticize invisible results. Faithful witness still requires truth, preparation, humility, and endurance.
- Connect: Invite the group to remember someone whose witness became clearer over time. Apply the passage to parenting, deacon service, teaching, friendship, and patient evangelism.
- Show: Contrast the opponents’ hands in verse 39 with Christ’s and the Father’s hands in verses 28-29. The Shepherd cannot be seized before His hour, and His sheep cannot be torn from His saving power.
Sources
Scripture is from NKJV.
St John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of John, Homily LXI on John 10:22-42: Homily LXI
St Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John, Book VII, Chapter III, on John 10:22-42: Book VII, Chapter III
St Athanasius of Alexandria, Discourse III Against the Arians, Chapter XXV, on John 10:30 and 10:38: Discourse III, Chapter XXV
St Athanasius of Alexandria, Discourse IV Against the Arians, section 17, on John 10:30-38: Discourse IV, section 17
Flavius Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, 12.7.7 on the Feast of Dedication and 20.9.7 on the eastern temple cloisters: Book 12 and Book 20
Greek text and morphology consulted for John 10:28, 10:30, and 10:35: SBLGNT John, John 10:28 interlinear, John 10:30 interlinear, and John 10:35 interlinear
Coptic Orthodox lectionary: checked evidence includes John 10:22-38 in Feast of the Cross and annual date-cycle Liturgy Gospel rows, John 10:34-38 for Friday of the fourth week of the Holy Fifty Days, and John 10:29-38 in Pascha Eve Ninth Hour evidence for Wednesday Eve and Thursday Eve. No checked assignment was found for John 10:39-42; a formal public bibliographic citation for these rows remains to be identified.
Footnotes
-
Flavius Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 12.7.7, on the eight-day festival commemorating restored temple sacrifice and worship, https://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/works/ant-12.htm ↩
-
Flavius Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews 20.9.7, reporting the first-century association of the eastern temple cloisters with Solomon, https://www.ccel.org/j/josephus/works/ant-20.htm ↩
-
SBLGNT John 10:28,
οὐ μὴ ἀπόλωνται εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα
, https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Faithlife/SBLGNT/master/data/sblgnt/text/John.txt; morphology at https://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/10-28.htm ↩ -
SBLGNT John 10:30,
ἐγὼ καὶ ὁ πατὴρ ἕν ἐσμεν
, https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Faithlife/SBLGNT/master/data/sblgnt/text/John.txt; morphology at https://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/10-30.htm ↩ -
St John Chrysostom, Homilies on John, Homily LXI, on John 10:26-27, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf114.iv.lxiii.html ↩
-
St John Chrysostom, Homilies on John, Homily LXI, on John 10:27-30, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf114.iv.lxiii.html ↩
-
St Athanasius of Alexandria, Discourse III Against the Arians, Chapter XXV, sections 10-11, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.xxi.ii.iv.iii.html#xxi.ii.iv.iii-p1 ↩
-
SBLGNT John 10:35,
καὶ οὐ δύναται λυθῆναι ἡ γραφή
, https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Faithlife/SBLGNT/master/data/sblgnt/text/John.txt; morphology at https://biblehub.com/interlinear/john/10-35.htm ↩ -
St John Chrysostom, Homilies on John, Homily LXI, on John 10:33-38, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf114.iv.lxiii.html ↩
-
St Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John, Book VII, Chapter III, on John 10:34-36, https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/cyril_on_john_07_book7.htm ↩
-
St Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John, Book VII, Chapter III, on John 10:36, https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/cyril_on_john_07_book7.htm ↩
-
St Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John, Book VII, Chapter III, on John 10:37-38, https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/cyril_on_john_07_book7.htm ↩
-
St Athanasius of Alexandria, Discourse IV Against the Arians, section 17, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.xxi.ii.vi.vii.html#xxi.ii.vi.vii-p14 ↩
-
St Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on John, Book VII, Chapter III, on John 10:40-42, https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/cyril_on_john_07_book7.htm ↩
-
St John Chrysostom, Homilies on John, Homily LXI, on John 10:39-42, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf114.iv.lxiii.html ↩
